H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 0-1
Christophe Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Christophe Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Christophe Rochus won the 2004 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 47
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2004* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Christophe Rochus | 6-3 6-1 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christophe Rochus | #998 | #38 | 1,248 | 1,740 | 114 | 208 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Christophe Rochus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #74 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #143 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #41 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #78 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #69 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |