Antony Dupuis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 13, 2005 | H2H |
| Max Mirnyi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC
Antony Dupuis holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2001 Washington Open round of 64 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | 7-6(5) 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data | Aug 15, 2001* | R64 | Washington Open | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,793 | 165 | 210 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,520 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 26 | 1999 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 27 | 2000 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 28 | 2001 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2001 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2002 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 41 | 60 | 101 | 40.6% | 20 | 38 | 58 | 34.5% | 19 | 22 | 41 | 46.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | 63 | 94 | 157 | 40.1% | 13 | 40 | 53 | 24.5% | 35 | 26 | 61 | 57.4% | 54 | 50 | 104 | 51.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/214 of Antony Dupuis's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16/18 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 51.2% | 68.4% | 46.2% | 58.7% | 43.7% | 57.9% | 39.8% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 38/41 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 48.0% | 70.6% | 46.8% | 53.3% | 40.1% | 58.2% | 38.8% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 18/21 | 8.6 | 7.1 | 44.8% | 77.2% | 45.0% | 65.0% | 33.6% | 59.6% | 35.1% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 37/37 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 50.5% | 78.2% | 48.5% | 63.9% | 44.6% | 63.5% | 38.1% |
| 23 | 1996 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 48.9% | 72.2% | 41.9% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 56.5% | 36.3% | 1996 | 43/48 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 53.1% | 75.6% | 49.1% | 64.9% | 39.1% | 62.9% | 37.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 38/42 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 50.7% | 72.9% | 47.9% | 58.1% | 42.5% | 60.3% | 36.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 39/45 | 8.6 | 5.4 | 50.7% | 78.2% | 47.8% | 51.6% | 43.1% | 63.0% | 35.7% |
| 26 | 1999 | 15/19 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 60.2% | 73.4% | 52.7% | 71.6% | 52.0% | 65.1% | 35.6% | 1999 | 40/45 | 7.2 | 4.4 | 50.7% | 76.0% | 50.4% | 53.9% | 37.6% | 63.3% | 36.1% |
| 27 | 2000 | 14/17 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 56.7% | 70.4% | 52.5% | 67.4% | 33.6% | 62.4% | 31.3% | 2000 | 33/40 | 9.1 | 5.4 | 52.5% | 75.0% | 46.4% | 65.6% | 39.4% | 61.4% | 35.4% |
| 28 | 2001 | 27/31 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 58.3% | 72.5% | 49.9% | 60.8% | 30.5% | 63.3% | 34.5% | 2001 | 26/29 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 52.8% | 69.9% | 45.7% | 55.7% | 37.5% | 58.2% | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2002 | 34/37 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 61.1% | 69.7% | 49.7% | 60.8% | 43.5% | 61.7% | 32.8% | 2002 | 4/4 | 6.3 | 7.3 | 50.9% | 73.7% | 45.0% | 63.6% | 37.2% | 58.9% | 39.1% |
| 30 | 2003 | 39/39 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 57.7% | 72.8% | 52.9% | 59.6% | 35.3% | 64.5% | 34.5% | 2003 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 6.0 | 58.0% | 63.5% | 39.4% | 37.7% | 13.3% | 52.7% | 32.3% |
| 31 | 2004 | 38/38 | 7.5 | 2.4 | 59.4% | 72.9% | 52.5% | 50.7% | 34.9% | 64.6% | 32.7% | 2004 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 54.0% | 67.6% | 41.4% | 62.5% | — | 55.6% | 27.8% |
| 32 | 2005 | 21/21 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 56.5% | 70.4% | 50.8% | 62.2% | 31.7% | 61.7% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 4/4 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 60.1% | 70.9% | 56.0% | 63.2% | 44.6% | 65.9% | 30.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 6/6 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 69.0% | 74.3% | 62.9% | 58.7% | 31.2% | 70.0% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 200/214 | 7.4 | 2.7 | 59.0% | 71.9% | 51.9% | 59.9% | 36.8% | 63.6% | 33.7% | — | 337/375 | 7.2 | 5.0 | 50.8% | 74.4% | 47.6% | 58.6% | 39.9% | 61.1% | 36.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1584 | 124.3 | -0.94 | -0.69 | 0.944 | 49.1% | -10 | +20 | — | 48.9% | -0.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | +1.25 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1634 | 137.4 | -2.68 | +0.92 | 0.927 | 48.1% | +22 | -94 | — | 43.4% | -0.56 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–7 (56%) | -2.64 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1632 | 123.0 | -2.23 | -1.70 | 0.869 | 47.6% | -33 | -99 | +66 | 42.4% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | +0.54 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1709 | 138.9 | +1.36 | +0.40 | 1.046 | 51.0% | -36 | -165 | +54 | 53.1% | +0.14 | 5–9 (36%) | 8–9 (47%) | -0.15 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1513 | 100.9 | -1.78 | -0.98 | 0.835 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 | 1996 | 1772 | 147.8 | +0.83 | +0.78 | 1.014 | 50.5% | +51 | -272 | -46 | 49.6% | +0.12 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–14 (42%) | -1.73 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1631 | 131.8 | -1.59 | -0.14 | 0.905 | 48.5% | +42 | -157 | — | 38.4% | -0.59 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–10 (38%) | -1.03 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1621 | 133.9 | +0.75 | -1.34 | 0.965 | 49.3% | +12 | -164 | +85 | 44.9% | -0.22 | 8–7 (53%) | 12–13 (48%) | -0.31 |
| 26 | 1999 | 1583 | 123.8 | +0.84 | -1.08 | 1.019 | 50.4% | +48 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.40 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–3 (67%) | +0.49 | 1999 | 1672 | 136.8 | +0.80 | -0.84 | 0.982 | 49.5% | -9 | -161 | +2 | 47.7% | +0.08 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | +0.22 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1526 | 117.0 | +0.02 | -3.25 | 0.831 | 47.5% | +31 | -34 | +15 | 30.2% | -1.12 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | -0.44 | 2000 | 1779 | 133.7 | -0.50 | -1.27 | 0.918 | 48.9% | -59 | -310 | +78 | 50.5% | -0.12 | 11–4 (73%) | 11–5 (69%) | +0.01 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1558 | 119.9 | +1.20 | -2.02 | 0.939 | 48.8% | -41 | +42 | -80 | 39.8% | -0.57 | 5–6 (45%) | 10–9 (53%) | -0.47 | 2001 | 1604 | 127.5 | -3.03 | -1.45 | 0.797 | 45.9% | +13 | -202 | +186 | 30.7% | -0.91 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–9 (25%) | -1.97 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1549 | 112.7 | -1.41 | -3.77 | 0.856 | 47.6% | +14 | -41 | -100 | 38.4% | -0.87 | 3–6 (33%) | 9–5 (64%) | +2.11 | 2002 | 1592 | 102.9 | -1.30 | +0.60 | 0.952 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.33 | 1–0 | 1–1 | -0.15 |
| 30 | 2003 | 1598 | 126.0 | +1.23 | -2.80 | 0.969 | 49.5% | -12 | -74 | -78 | 47.5% | -0.23 | 5–8 (38%) | 11–10 (52%) | +0.52 | 2003 | 1520 | 96.3 | -4.05 | -0.39 | 0.683 | 42.6% | +61 | — | — | 10.0% | -2.70 | — | 0–2 | -0.16 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1599 | 120.8 | +0.82 | -3.37 | 0.925 | 48.6% | 0 | -85 | -10 | 46.3% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 15–9 (63%) | +1.23 | 2004 | 1515 | 99.3 | -2.03 | +1.03 | 0.625 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 32 | 2005 | 1608 | 116.8 | -1.11 | -1.52 | 0.907 | 48.3% | -67 | -40 | +59 | 35.4% | -0.79 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–6 (33%) | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 1570 | 103.4 | +0.73 | -2.14 | 0.881 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.71 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | -0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 1618 | 108.8 | +0.42 | -1.19 | 1.126 | 51.9% | — | — | +134 | 69.2% | +0.46 | 0–1 | 4–2 (67%) | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 1580 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 1559 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1687 | 122.0 | +0.28 | -2.66 | 0.924 | 48.7% | -3 | -38 | -7 | 42.2% | -0.57 | 25–37 (40%) | 63–53 (54%) | +1.85 | — | 1793 | 139.5 | -0.56 | -0.38 | 0.939 | 48.9% | +8 | -123 | +64 | 44.9% | -0.27 | 59–57 (51%) | 75–85 (47%) | -1.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 13, 2005 | H2H |
| Max Mirnyi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Rosset | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Marat Safin | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 7 | 8 | Mar 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Petr Korda | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 26, 1998 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 8, 2001 | H2H |