H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-3
Fernando Vicente holds a 3–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2006 Houston fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2006* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-2 7-5 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| May 2, 2003* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-3 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |