H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 0-1
Gianluca Pozzi holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gianluca Pozzi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gianluca Pozzi won the 2000 Newport third round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2000* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Gianluca Pozzi | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Gianluca Pozzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |