H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-1
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Casablanca third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 7-5 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |