H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-1
Antony Dupuis and Hyung-Taik Lee are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on clay, while Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2002 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Antony Dupuis | 6-3 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2001* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 6-1 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Antony Dupuis | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |