H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 13:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Irakli Labadze H2H: 0-1
Irakli Labadze holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irakli Labadze leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Irakli Labadze won the 2002 Barcelona second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 45
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2002* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Irakli Labadze | 7-5 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Irakli Labadze | #656 | #42 | 805 | 1,679 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Irakli Labadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #72 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #78 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #140 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #164 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |