H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs James Blake H2H: 2-1
Antony Dupuis holds a 2–1 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2006 Houston third round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Antony Dupuis | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | James Blake | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2005* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Antony Dupuis | 6-2 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2005* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | James Blake | 6-4 6-1 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |