H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 1999 Shanghai fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |