H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-0
Antony Dupuis holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-0 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Antony Dupuis | 2-6 6-0 6-3 7-6(2) | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |