Antony Dupuis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 13, 2005 | H2H |
| Max Mirnyi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Sebastien De Chaunac H2H: 0-1
Sebastien De Chaunac holds a 1–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien De Chaunac leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien De Chaunac won the 2004 Indianapolis round of 64 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastien De Chaunac | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data | Jul 21, 2004* | R64 | Indianapolis | International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sebastien De Chaunac | #952 | #130 | 428 | 1,657 | 11 | 22 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #601 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 23 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2003 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 41 | 60 | 101 | 40.6% | 20 | 38 | 58 | 34.5% | 19 | 22 | 41 | 46.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/214 of Antony Dupuis's and 28/29 of Sebastien De Chaunac's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 1996 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 48.9% | 72.2% | 41.9% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 56.5% | 36.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 15/19 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 60.2% | 73.4% | 52.7% | 71.6% | 52.0% | 65.1% | 35.6% | 2004 | 8/8 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 56.2% | 66.9% | 47.9% | 46.2% | 33.3% | 58.5% | 31.5% |
| 27 | 2000 | 14/17 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 56.7% | 70.4% | 52.5% | 67.4% | 33.6% | 62.4% | 31.3% | 2005 | 6/7 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 55.3% | 69.7% | 49.7% | 62.5% | 42.6% | 60.9% | 35.4% |
| 28 | 2001 | 27/31 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 58.3% | 72.5% | 49.9% | 60.8% | 30.5% | 63.3% | 34.5% | 2006 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 59.7% | 65.0% | 51.9% | 70.0% | 0.0% | 59.7% | 25.0% |
| 29 | 2002 | 34/37 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 61.1% | 69.7% | 49.7% | 60.8% | 43.5% | 61.7% | 32.8% | 2007 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 60.7% | 74.3% | 47.9% | 63.6% | 30.0% | 63.9% | 32.2% |
| 30 | 2003 | 39/39 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 57.7% | 72.8% | 52.9% | 59.6% | 35.3% | 64.5% | 34.5% | 2008 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 56.3% | 65.9% | 48.5% | 27.8% | 66.7% | 58.1% | 26.9% |
| 31 | 2004 | 38/38 | 7.5 | 2.4 | 59.4% | 72.9% | 52.5% | 50.7% | 34.9% | 64.6% | 32.7% | 2009 | 10/10 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 51.0% | 74.7% | 48.0% | 59.3% | 32.2% | 61.5% | 33.8% |
| 32 | 2005 | 21/21 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 56.5% | 70.4% | 50.8% | 62.2% | 31.7% | 61.7% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 4/4 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 60.1% | 70.9% | 56.0% | 63.2% | 44.6% | 65.9% | 30.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 6/6 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 69.0% | 74.3% | 62.9% | 58.7% | 31.2% | 70.0% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 200/214 | 7.4 | 2.7 | 59.0% | 71.9% | 51.9% | 59.9% | 36.8% | 63.6% | 33.7% | — | 28/33 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 54.5% | 70.4% | 48.5% | 54.5% | 36.0% | 60.3% | 32.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Sebastien De Chaunac | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1501 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1513 | 100.9 | -1.78 | -0.98 | 0.835 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | 2001 | 1529 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1522 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1494 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1583 | 123.8 | +0.84 | -1.08 | 1.019 | 50.4% | +48 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.40 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.6 | +0.49 | 2004 | 1525 | 112.4 | -2.44 | -1.09 | 0.759 | 45.9% | +87 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.26 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.13 |
| 27 | 2000 | 1526 | 117.0 | +0.02 | -3.25 | 0.831 | 47.5% | +31 | -34 | +15 | 30.2% | -1.12 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | 97.1 | -0.44 | 2005 | 1493 | 107.9 | -1.10 | -0.18 | 0.905 | 48.4% | +56 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.64 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.12 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1558 | 119.9 | +1.20 | -2.02 | 0.939 | 48.8% | -41 | +42 | -80 | 39.8% | -0.57 | 5–6 (45%) | 10–9 (53%) | 103.4 | -0.47 | 2006 | 1472 | 99.4 | +1.35 | -1.93 | 0.620 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 29 | 2002 | 1549 | 112.7 | -1.41 | -3.77 | 0.856 | 47.6% | +14 | -41 | -100 | 38.4% | -0.87 | 3–6 (33%) | 9–5 (64%) | 100.7 | +2.11 | 2007 | 1507 | 103.5 | +3.84 | +0.85 | 0.893 | 48.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 30 | 2003 | 1598 | 126.0 | +1.23 | -2.80 | 0.969 | 49.5% | -12 | -74 | -78 | 47.5% | -0.23 | 5–8 (38%) | 11–10 (52%) | 101.7 | +0.52 | 2008 | 1514 | 114.1 | -0.58 | -2.29 | 0.641 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.13 |
| 31 | 2004 | 1599 | 120.8 | +0.82 | -3.37 | 0.925 | 48.6% | 0 | -85 | -10 | 46.3% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 15–9 (63%) | 101.1 | +1.23 | 2009 | 1614 | 118.1 | -2.48 | -0.79 | 0.878 | 48.2% | +39 | — | — | 46.4% | -0.64 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.6 | +0.41 |
| 32 | 2005 | 1608 | 116.8 | -1.11 | -1.52 | 0.907 | 48.3% | -67 | -40 | +59 | 35.4% | -0.79 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.0 | +0.24 | 2010 | 1544 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 1570 | 103.4 | +0.73 | -2.14 | 0.881 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.71 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 1618 | 108.8 | +0.42 | -1.19 | 1.126 | 51.9% | — | — | +134 | 69.2% | +0.46 | 0–1 | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 1580 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 1559 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1687 | 122.0 | +0.28 | -2.66 | 0.924 | 48.7% | -3 | -38 | -7 | 42.2% | -0.57 | 25–37 (40%) | 63–53 (54%) | 101.7 | +1.85 | — | 1657 | 114.1 | -1.67 | -0.83 | 0.821 | 47.1% | +58 | +7 | — | 34.1% | -1.09 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.9 | -1.47 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Sebastien De Chaunac
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 2009 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2009 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 7, 2009 | H2H |
| Dmitry Tursunov | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Denis Istomin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 4, 2009 | H2H |