H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Antony Dupuis vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-4
Tim Henman holds a 4–0 lead over Antony Dupuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Vienna third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2005* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-5 6-3 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2004* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Tim Henman | 6-1 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2001* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-1 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antony Dupuis | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |