H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-1
Arnaud Boetsch and Andrei Olhovskiy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-2 6-3 7-5 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1993* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 7-5 6-3 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |