H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Claudio Pistolesi H2H: 0-1
Claudio Pistolesi holds a 1–0 lead over Arnaud Boetsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudio Pistolesi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Pistolesi won the 1992 Bordeaux third round 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1992* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Claudio Pistolesi | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Claudio Pistolesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |