H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 2-0
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1991 Miami Masters first round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1991* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Arnaud Boetsch | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-2 6-1 6-0 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |