H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Arnaud Boetsch vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-1

Arnaud Boetsch holds a 4–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1996 US Open third round 6-4 6-2 7-6(6).

FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Arnaud Boetsch #20 6-4 6-2 7-6(6) Jeff Tarango #104 Match data
May 25, 1995* Bologna ATP 250 R32 Clay Arnaud Boetsch #53 6-3 6-3 Jeff Tarango #70 Match data
Feb 23, 1995* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #83 6-7(3) 7-6(0) 6-2 Arnaud Boetsch #57 Match data
Oct 1, 1993* Basel ATP 250 R16 Hard Arnaud Boetsch #24 6-0 6-1 Jeff Tarango #65 Match data
Sep 4, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Arnaud Boetsch #42 4-6 6-4 6-3 7-6(3) Jeff Tarango #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Boetsch #1,323 #12 1,611 1,915 217 196 52.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Boetsch Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–3 25.0% #435 1,502 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 1–3 25.0% #275 1,507 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 3–6 33.3% #212 1,508 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 2–4 33.3% #176 1,548 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1991 22–18 55.0% #54 1,729 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1992 34–25 57.6% #27 1,874 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1993 42–24 63.6% #20 1,900 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 24–24 50.0% #53 1,729 0 2 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1995 45–33 57.7% #14 1,887 0 3 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1996 27–25 51.9% #33 1,828 0 3 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1997 13–22 37.1% #106 1,644 0 3 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1998 2–7 22.2% #305 1,579 0 3 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 1–2 33.3% #580 1,574 0 3 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2