H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Arnaud Boetsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1997 US Open second round 6-4 6-0 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Leander Paes | 6-4 6-0 2-1 (ret.) | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |