H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-0
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 1–0 lead over Libor Pimek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1991 Prague fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1991* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-2 6-3 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |