H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Albert Costa H2H: 1-3

Albert Costa holds a 3–1 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 3–0 on clay, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2003 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-4.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Arnaud Clement #33 7-6(5) 6-4 Albert Costa #24 Match data
Jun 4, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Albert Costa #9 6-2 7-5 7-5 Arnaud Clement #36 Match data
May 8, 2003* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Albert Costa #8 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #36 Match data
Sep 19, 1998* Bournemouth ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Costa #17 4-6 6-3 7-6(2) Arnaud Clement #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4