H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Alex Calatrava H2H: 2-0
Arnaud Clement holds a 2–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters second round 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2000* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Arnaud Clement | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Alex Calatrava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |