H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-2

Arnaud Clement and Cedric Pioline are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Cedric Pioline #39 6-3 6-1 6-3 Arnaud Clement #74 Match data
May 26, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Arnaud Clement #81 3-6 3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #28 Match data
Feb 6, 1999* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Arnaud Clement #103 6-4 6-1 Cedric Pioline #18 Match data
Oct 17, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #24 6-2 6-2 Arnaud Clement #109 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —