H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-5

Fabrice Santoro holds a 5–2 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Fabrice Santoro leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2007 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Fabrice Santoro #51 6-2 6-4 6-4 Arnaud Clement #44 Match data
Jun 16, 2006* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Fabrice Santoro #49 6-4 7-6(2) Arnaud Clement #59 Match data
Feb 18, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Arnaud Clement #65 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #41 Match data
May 26, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fabrice Santoro #58 6-4 6-3 6-7(5) 3-6 16-14 Arnaud Clement #33 Match data
Oct 4, 2003* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Arnaud Clement #39 6-2 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #52 Match data
Feb 7, 1999* Marseille ATP 250 F Hard Fabrice Santoro #59 6-3 4-6 6-4 Arnaud Clement #103 Match data
Apr 22, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabrice Santoro #25 6-2 6-1 Arnaud Clement #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6