H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 5-3

Arnaud Clement holds a 5–3 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Arnaud Clement leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2003 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(2) 5-7 6-2.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Arnaud Clement #33 7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 Greg Rusedski #59 Match data
Feb 21, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Arnaud Clement #45 6-3 7-6(4) Greg Rusedski #30 Match data
Jan 24, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Arnaud Clement #18 6-3 6-2 7-5 Greg Rusedski #65 Match data
Nov 15, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Arnaud Clement #18 7-6(5) 7-5 Greg Rusedski #67 Match data
Feb 24, 2000* London ATP 250 R32 Hard Greg Rusedski #15 6-3 6-4 Arnaud Clement #54 Match data
Aug 28, 1999* Boston ATP 250 SF Hard Greg Rusedski #9 6-4 5-7 6-2 Arnaud Clement #61 Match data
Oct 3, 1998* Toulouse ATP 250 QF Hard Greg Rusedski #14 6-4 6-1 Arnaud Clement #95 Match data
Mar 21, 1997* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Carpet Arnaud Clement #280 (w/o) Greg Rusedski #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Greg Rusedski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4