H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1
Arnaud Clement holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2003 Lyon quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2003* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 6-4 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 4-6 6-2 6-2 4-6 0-1 (ret.) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |