H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-3
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 3–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2006* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 6-4 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-4 6-4 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2002* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arnaud Clement | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |