H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 3-2

Arnaud Clement holds a 3–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2007 Stockholm quarterfinal 7-6(1) 3-6 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2007* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #25 7-6(1) 3-6 7-6(7) Arnaud Clement #40 Match data
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Arnaud Clement #42 7-6(5) 6-4 4-6 6-7(6) 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #30 Match data
Jun 24, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 F Grass Ivo Karlovic #61 3-6 6-4 6-4 Arnaud Clement #38 Match data
Jun 16, 2007* Queen's Club ATP 500 QF Grass Arnaud Clement #43 7-5 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #78 Match data
Jun 17, 2004* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Arnaud Clement #38 7-6(8) 6-7(5) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8