H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 14:15 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 0-2
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2008 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 6-1 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Jarkko Nieminen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |