H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 1-1
Arnaud Clement and Joachim Johansson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joachim Johansson leads 1–0 on grass, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2004 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-6(3) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Joachim Johansson | 6-2 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2004* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-4 7-5 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |