H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs John Van Lottum H2H: 3-0
Arnaud Clement holds a 3–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2000 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 6-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 7-6(2) 6-4 (ret.) | John Van Lottum | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | John Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1998* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Arnaud Clement | 6-1 6-0 | John Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |