H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 3-2

Arnaud Clement holds a 3–2 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Arnaud Clement leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2008 Canada Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-0.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #188 6-3 3-6 6-0 Arnaud Clement #72 Match data
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Arnaud Clement #145 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 7-6(4) Jonas Bjorkman #128 Match data
Jun 23, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Arnaud Clement #38 6-2 6-4 Jonas Bjorkman #31 Match data
Aug 12, 2002 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Arnaud Clement #42 6-4 7-5 Jonas Bjorkman #46 Match data
Aug 27, 1998* Boston ATP 250 R32 Hard Jonas Bjorkman #12 6-2 6-3 Arnaud Clement #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6