H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-7

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 7–2 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2006 Washington quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-4.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2006* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Arnaud Clement #57 7-6(1) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #12 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-3 6-4 6-1 Arnaud Clement #111 Match data
Jan 14, 2005* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #106 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 2-6 6-1 6-1 Arnaud Clement #106 Match data
Jan 17, 2004* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #15 6-1 4-6 6-3 Arnaud Clement #31 Match data
May 15, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(6) Arnaud Clement #37 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Arnaud Clement #42 (w/o) Lleyton Hewitt #1 Match data
Sep 8, 2000* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-2 6-4 6-3 Arnaud Clement #37 Match data
Jun 17, 1999* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #36 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 Arnaud Clement #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30