H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-2
Lukasz Kubot holds a 2–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2 3-6 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-2 3-6 5-7 6-4 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2010* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-1 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arnaud Clement | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |