H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Marc Rosset H2H: 3-1
Arnaud Clement holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2001 Rotterdam third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2000* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 6-4 7-5 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| May 12, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Arnaud Clement | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1997* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Arnaud Clement | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |