H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Mariano Zabaleta H2H: 2-1

Arnaud Clement holds a 2–1 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 2002 Hamburg Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mariano Zabaleta
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mariano Zabaleta #61 6-4 6-4 Arnaud Clement #46 Match data
Apr 20, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Arnaud Clement #59 6-7(3) 6-0 7-5 Mariano Zabaleta #23 Match data
Jan 13, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Arnaud Clement #55 4-6 6-3 6-4 Mariano Zabaleta #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mariano Zabaleta #1,009 #21 1,426 1,878 199 206 49.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Mariano Zabaleta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #381 1,514 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 9–8 52.9% #103 1,598 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1997 0–6 0.0% #257 1,531 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1998 14–8 63.6% #63 1,692 0 1
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1999 28–29 49.1% #28 1,686 0 1
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2000 17–26 39.5% #61 1,635 0 1
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2001 18–18 50.0% #59 1,723 0 1
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2002 20–28 41.7% #53 1,629 0 1
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2003 33–24 57.9% #27 1,763 0 2
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2004 25–20 55.6% #54 1,708 0 3
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2005 20–16 55.6% #83 1,726 0 3
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2006 4–8 33.3% #243 1,596 0 3
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2007 9–11 45.0% #104 1,602 0 3
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2008 0–2 0.0% #1141 1,556 0 3
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —