H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 0-2
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Stuttgart Masters third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2000* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1997* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |