H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Michael Chang H2H: 2-1
Arnaud Clement holds a 2–1 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2000 Long Island quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2000* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 6-2 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Arnaud Clement | 6-3 6-3 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| May 14, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Michael Chang | 7-5 6-1 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Michael Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |