H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-1

Arnaud Clement and Nicolas Almagro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2008 Miami Masters second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #25 6-2 6-2 Arnaud Clement #75 Match data
Oct 28, 2006* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet Arnaud Clement #50 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —