H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 0-3

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Barcelona third round 7-6(2) 6-2.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 3
3 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #8 7-6(2) 6-2 Arnaud Clement #57 Match data
Aug 24, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-2 6-1 Arnaud Clement #46 Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #52 6-7(6) 4-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 Arnaud Clement #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4