H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Peter Luczak H2H: 4-0

Arnaud Clement holds a 4–0 lead over Peter Luczak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2010 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Peter Luczak
AUS Age 47 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Arnaud Clement #86 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 6-4 Peter Luczak #83 Match data Jun 24, 2010* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Arnaud Clement #76 4-6 6-3 6-2 Peter Luczak #74 Match data Mar 13, 2010* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Peter Luczak #157 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #88 Match data Jan 12, 2009 Q1 Q Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Arnaud Clement #53 6-1 6-2 Peter Luczak #129 Match data Mar 21, 2006* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Arnaud Clement #42 6-4 6-4 Peter Luczak #140 Match data Mar 18, 2003* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Peter Luczak #1,007 #64 775 1,687 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Peter Luczak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2003 4–8 33.3% #141 1,488 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1 2004 3–5 37.5% #150 1,491 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2 2005 5–9 35.7% #145 1,552 0 0
26 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2 2006 5–9 35.7% #166 1,579 0 0
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2 2007 3–7 30.0% #79 1,508 0 0
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4 2008 5–11 31.2% #156 1,516 0 0
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4 2009 2–6 25.0% #77 1,592 0 0
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2010 9–21 30.0% #137 1,612 0 0
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4 2011 1–4 20.0% #271 1,536 0 0
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arnaud Clement Peter Luczak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 2 11 13 15.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6% — 17 38 55 30.9% 16 38 54 29.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's and 117/117 of Peter Luczak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Arnaud Clement Peter Luczak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 12/12 5.6 4.3 62.1% 71.3% 45.8% 62.4% 44.7% 61.7% 34.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/8 3.8 3.4 62.9% 64.6% 48.1% 62.9% 28.7% 58.6% 34.9%
25 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1% 2005 14/14 3.7 2.1 66.7% 63.8% 52.2% 44.4% 35.3% 59.6% 34.6%
26 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1% 2006 14/14 7.8 2.1 64.5% 69.5% 53.6% 51.9% 47.2% 63.2% 31.8%
27 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8% 2007 10/10 7.1 2.9 59.9% 69.7% 48.8% 69.2% 36.6% 61.6% 32.3%
28 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9% 2008 16/16 4.1 2.3 58.2% 62.6% 47.4% 52.4% 45.7% 56.4% 35.2%
29 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4% 2009 8/8 5.3 2.9 60.0% 67.9% 49.0% 52.7% 29.0% 60.5% 34.4%
30 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6% 2010 30/30 5.8 2.4 59.9% 69.7% 49.9% 55.4% 31.5% 61.9% 31.9%
31 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4% 2011 5/5 3.8 2.8 61.8% 69.5% 44.6% 45.7% 37.5% 59.8% 26.0%
32 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9% — 117/117 5.4 2.7 61.5% 67.7% 49.3% 55.1% 37.5% 60.6% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arnaud Clement Peter Luczak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51 2001 1486 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08 2002 1500 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18 2003 1488 107.8 -0.49 -1.23 0.892 48.7% +20 — — 41.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.07
24 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05 2004 1492 113.7 -2.14 -2.20 0.843 47.4% — +61 — 44.4% -0.39 1–1 1–1 — -0.10
25 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58 2005 1552 127.3 -0.91 -0.96 0.858 47.5% -17 +30 — 37.5% -0.85 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.40
26 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33 2006 1580 120.6 +0.42 -2.46 0.864 47.9% +7 -19 — 42.1% -0.32 2–3 (40%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.75
27 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41 2007 1508 108.1 -0.95 -3.71 0.840 47.7% +30 -20 — 37.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.31
28 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40 2008 1516 119.4 -3.72 -1.69 0.806 46.8% +63 -39 — 32.4% -1.41 0–1 0–2 — +0.52
29 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44 2009 1593 125.5 -1.70 -1.58 0.872 47.6% +4 -29 — 35.0% -0.85 0–2 1–1 — -0.24
30 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32 2010 1612 135.8 -0.41 -3.16 0.836 47.1% +1 -43 -5 36.0% -1.09 1–6 (14%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.33
31 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79 2011 1536 113.9 -0.87 -2.48 0.647 44.4% — +65 — 16.7% -1.58 1–0 1–1 — -0.15
32 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72 2012 1533 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1539 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52 — 1687 126.5 -1.10 -2.26 0.838 47.4% +15 -7 -5 37.0% -0.84 12–21 (36%) 25–30 (45%) 99.1 -1.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.