H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 1-6

Sjeng Schalken holds a 6–1 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Libéma Open final 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #12 6-3 6-4 Arnaud Clement #30 Match data Jun 22, 2003* F Libéma Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Sjeng Schalken #19 4-6 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #37 Match data Oct 31, 2002* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Sjeng Schalken #31 3-6 6-3 6-2 Arnaud Clement #42 Match data Jun 23, 2002* F Libéma Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Sjeng Schalken #28 6-3 7-6(1) Arnaud Clement #42 Match data Feb 28, 2002* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Sjeng Schalken #49 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(2) Arnaud Clement #48 Match data Nov 3, 1999* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Sjeng Schalken #55 7-5 7-6(4) Arnaud Clement #46 Match data Oct 27, 1999* R64 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Arnaud Clement #94 4-6 7-6(5) 6-0 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data Feb 5, 1998* R32 Marseille ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3
22 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arnaud Clement Sjeng Schalken
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
21 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
26 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6% — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's and 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Arnaud Clement Sjeng Schalken
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6%
25 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1% 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3%
26 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1% 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7%
27 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8% 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1%
28 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9% 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4%
29 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9% — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arnaud Clement Sjeng Schalken
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54
19 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30
20 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14
21 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65
22 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44
23 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15
24 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67
25 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32
26 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00
27 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66
28 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00
29 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52 — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.