H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Arnaud Clement vs Ti Chen.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | 6-2 6-1 | Ti Chen | Match data | Aug 29, 2005 | Q1 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,975 | 302 | 315 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ti Chen | #1,433 | #184 | 270 | 1,526 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Ti Chen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,817 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #106 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,635 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Ti Chen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1997 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 174 | 171 | 345 | 50.4% | 39 | 63 | 102 | 38.2% | 50 | 43 | 93 | 53.8% | 39 | 38 | 77 | 50.6% | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Ti Chen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1997 | 1643 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -121 | +17 | 51.0% | -0.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1621 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -116 | +11 | 38.7% | -0.84 | 3–8 (27%) | 6–2 (75%) | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1690 | 140.1 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -132 | -67 | 46.7% | -0.25 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–14 (18%) | — | -1.51 | 2005 | 1455 | 95.8 | -1.39 | -0.30 | 0.731 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1908 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -337 | -276 | 53.6% | +0.22 | 13–10 (57%) | 14–6 (70%) | — | -3.08 | 2006 | 1436 | 92.0 | -1.13 | -2.15 | 0.481 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1769 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -229 | -124 | 53.9% | +0.37 | 10–10 (50%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +2.18 | 2007 | 1482 | 107.1 | +2.38 | +1.68 | 0.664 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1816 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -227 | -73 | 58.3% | +0.51 | 2–9 (18%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | +0.05 | 2008 | 1465 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 1817 | 139.0 | +0.67 | +2.97 | 1.121 | 52.0% | +5 | -123 | -16 | 59.7% | +0.47 | 9–10 (47%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | +1.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 1629 | 133.4 | 0.00 | +0.38 | 0.975 | 49.6% | +56 | -24 | +123 | 43.3% | -0.29 | 2–9 (18%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -0.33 | 2010 | 1450 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1738 | 137.6 | -0.72 | +0.35 | 0.950 | 49.4% | +9 | -121 | — | 48.5% | -0.20 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–3 (70%) | — | -1.41 | 2011 | 1463 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1799 | 148.4 | +2.29 | +2.03 | 1.088 | 51.4% | +25 | -189 | -88 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 9–7 (56%) | 13–5 (72%) | — | -2.40 | 2012 | 1439 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1703 | 139.6 | +1.15 | +1.02 | 1.026 | 50.2% | -17 | -108 | +106 | 46.7% | -0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–21 (32%) | — | -1.44 | 2013 | 1420 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1636 | 123.7 | -1.41 | -0.99 | 0.918 | 48.5% | -40 | -110 | +244 | 43.4% | -0.58 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1752 | 136.1 | -1.61 | -0.33 | 0.906 | 48.7% | +30 | -187 | -8 | 41.4% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.79 | 2015 | 1389 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1683 | 138.5 | -1.51 | -0.46 | 0.921 | 48.6% | -9 | -122 | +106 | 39.4% | -0.55 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–12 (14%) | — | -1.72 | 2016 | 1365 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 1664 | 121.1 | -0.97 | -0.87 | 0.941 | 49.4% | -38 | — | +109 | 43.2% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.04 | 2017 | 1384 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 1635 | 110.9 | -1.82 | +1.02 | 0.937 | 49.0% | +18 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.45 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1975 | 144.3 | -0.01 | +0.76 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +9 | -159 | +20 | 49.2% | -0.04 | 86–111 (44%) | 118–114 (51%) | 95.7 | -1.52 | — | 1527 | 96.7 | -0.05 | -0.26 | 0.615 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jul 30, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 10 | 11 | Oct 22, 2010 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jun 27, 2010 | H2H |
| Sebastien Grosjean | 5 | 4 | 9 | Apr 27, 2007 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 2 | 7 | 9 | Aug 5, 2006 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 27, 2007 | H2H |
| Satoshi Iwabuchi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 4, 2006 | H2H |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |