H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-4

Tim Henman holds a 4–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Zagreb third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 2, 2006* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tim Henman #43 6-3 6-3 Arnaud Clement #63 Match data
Mar 9, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #6 4-6 6-4 6-3 Arnaud Clement #133 Match data
Oct 27, 2000* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #10 6-3 6-4 Arnaud Clement #28 Match data
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tim Henman #14 6-4 6-4 6-4 Arnaud Clement #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —