H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-2

Todd Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Arnaud Clement #38 6-3 6-4 7-6(2) Todd Martin #40 Match data
Apr 15, 1999* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Todd Martin #8 6-4 7-6(5) Arnaud Clement #89 Match data
Aug 17, 1998 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Todd Martin #28 4-6 6-1 6-4 Arnaud Clement #97 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —