H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-6

Tommy Haas holds a 6–1 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2009 Paris Masters third round 5-7 6-3 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 2009* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Arnaud Clement #93 5-7 6-3 7-6(8) Tommy Haas #17 Match data
Mar 8, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #28 6-3 1-6 6-4 Arnaud Clement #52 Match data
Aug 25, 2001* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Tommy Haas #16 6-3 7-6(3) Arnaud Clement #12 Match data
Aug 5, 2001* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tommy Haas #24 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #12 Match data
Oct 13, 2000* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #28 6-2 6-1 Arnaud Clement #26 Match data
Oct 22, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tommy Haas #53 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 Arnaud Clement #117 Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Tommy Haas #37 6-4 1-6 6-3 Arnaud Clement #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15