H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Angel Gimenez H2H: 4-1
Balazs Taroczy holds a 4–1 lead over Angel Gimenez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1981 Rome fourth round 6-1 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 70
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1981* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1981* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-1 7-6 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1981* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1981* | Cairo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 7-5 6-4 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1979* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Angel Gimenez | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Angel Gimenez | #806 | #41 | 0 | 1,777 | 86 | 106 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Angel Gimenez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #332 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #42 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #195 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |