H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Bob Hewitt H2H: 0-2
Bob Hewitt holds a 2–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1977 Rome third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1977* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Bob Hewitt | 6-4 6-4 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Bob Hewitt | 6-2 6-1 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Bob Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 |