H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Dick Crealy H2H: 1-0
Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1978 Philadelphia Wct second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1978* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Balazs Taroczy | 6-4 6-4 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |