H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Jose Higueras H2H: 3-0
Balazs Taroczy holds a 3–0 lead over Jose Higueras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1982 Bournemouth quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 73
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1982* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Jose Higueras | Match data |
| May 15, 1981* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 6-1 | Jose Higueras | Match data |
| May 21, 1980* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 7-6 6-3 | Jose Higueras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Jose Higueras | #335 | #6 | 0 | 2,088 | 427 | 226 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Jose Higueras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #128 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #46 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #42 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 62–19 | 76.5% | #14 | 2,008 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 61–22 | 73.5% | #9 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #30 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1981 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,758 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #12 | 1,929 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #7 | 1,931 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 17 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #182 | 1,687 | 0 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #330 | 1,722 | 0 | 17 |