H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 2-0
Balazs Taroczy holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1978 Bastad quarterfinal 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1978* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-4 7-6 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1976* | Nuremberg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 6-1 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |