H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Balazs Taroczy vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 1-1

Balazs Taroczy and Paul Mcnamee are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1984 Aix En Provence round of 32 6-2 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Paul Mcnamee
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Mcnamee #33 6-2 4-6 6-1 Balazs Taroczy #62 Match data Apr 26, 1984* R32 Aix En Provence ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy #30 6-4 6-4 Paul Mcnamee #46 Match data Jul 12, 1980* QF Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Paul Mcnamee #524 #24 0 1,900 229 217 51.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Balazs Taroczy Paul Mcnamee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,466 0 0
19 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0 1974 0–4 0.0% #318 1,439 0 0
20 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1 1976 2–8 20.0% #174 1,413 0 0
22 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2 1977 14–18 43.8% #84 1,603 0 0
23 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2 1978 17–24 41.5% #120 1,654 0 0
24 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4 1979 13–13 50.0% #82 1,692 0 0
25 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6 1980 45–30 60.0% #40 1,882 0 1
26 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9 1981 14–11 56.0% #48 1,773 0 1
27 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11 1982 23–16 59.0% #34 1,827 0 2
28 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13 1983 38–26 59.4% #35 1,817 0 2
29 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,726 0 2
30 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13 1985 13–12 52.0% #48 1,717 0 2
31 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13 1986 24–19 55.8% #45 1,707 0 2
32 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13 1987 7–14 33.3% #194 1,604 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #456 1,646 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Balazs Taroczy Paul Mcnamee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
23 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 8 18 55.6%
26 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 1983 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 1986 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8% — 35 38 73 47.9% 103 99 202 51.0% 55 46 101 54.5% 36 34 70 51.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Balazs Taroczy Paul Mcnamee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1492 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.19
18 1972 1565 121.5 — — — — — +57 — 52.6% +0.16 — 0–1 — +0.47 1973 1466 94.3 — — — — — — +35 20.0% -1.90 1–0 — — +0.37
19 1973 1554 107.9 — — — — — +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.06 1974 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +20 11.1% -1.45 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.40
20 1974 1771 134.2 — — — — -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1975 1822 144.6 — — — — -131 +46 — 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.56 1976 1414 106.8 — — — — +83 +98 — 21.7% -1.35 0–1 0–5 (0%) — +0.74
22 1976 1849 144.3 — — — — -88 +40 — 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.42 1977 1603 140.6 — — — — — +58 -142 41.3% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.15
23 1977 1853 149.0 — — — — -90 +29 — 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.51 1978 1655 130.9 — — — — -177 +90 -227 42.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.07
24 1978 1908 153.4 — — — — -103 +93 — 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.19 1979 1693 128.0 — — — — -194 +48 -201 48.4% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.46
25 1979 1814 149.3 — — — — -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.25 1980 1882 152.0 — — — — -89 -75 -120 60.4% +0.48 6–12 (33%) 21–8 (72%) — -1.40
26 1980 1931 156.3 — — — — -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.18 1981 1773 132.7 — — — — +11 -5 -30 57.6% +0.47 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.51
27 1981 1940 157.8 — — — — -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.14 1982 1827 143.7 — — — — +32 -101 -6 56.3% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.05
28 1982 1864 151.2 — — — — -49 +58 — 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.65 1983 1817 142.6 — — — — -5 -26 +9 53.6% +0.27 13–6 (68%) 16–14 (53%) — -0.72
29 1983 1784 148.0 — — — — +17 +44 — 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.31 1984 1726 140.2 — — — — +31 +84 +45 48.2% -0.05 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.45
30 1984 1751 140.2 — — — — -22 +109 — 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.48 1985 1717 130.4 — — — — -26 +29 +129 58.6% +0.24 2–9 (18%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.11
31 1985 1645 133.7 — — — — +37 +90 — 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.57 1986 1707 136.0 — — — — -61 +70 +161 52.8% +0.20 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.28
32 1986 1643 107.5 — — — — — +109 — 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.18 1987 1605 124.6 — — — — -22 +116 +204 36.5% -0.85 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1646 110.2 — — — — -17 — — 50.0% -0.30 — — — +0.21
Career — 2002 154.5 — — — — -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11 — 1901 144.6 — — — — -36 +35 -14 50.8% +0.03 63–64 (50%) 86–77 (53%) 101.8 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.